William Gonzalez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| William Gonzalez and Michael Gonzalez |
| County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Office, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Michel Moore, California Highway Patrol and Does 1 to 100 inclusive |
| 2:2022cv04749 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal- Remand to Superior Court (rolm) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (aco) |
| Filing 11 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE by ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff's counsel moved to remand the action to Los Angeles Superior Court based on the procedural defect. Based on the procedural defect, the Court grants Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Accordingly, this action is remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV16790. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (aco) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for September 19, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. by Judge Percy Anderson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-04749 PA(MRWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiffs Michael Gonzalez, William Gonzalez pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770 as to Los Angeles Police Department. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants California Highway Patrol, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Office, Los Angeles Police Department, Michel Moore amending Amended Complaint,, filed by Plaintiffs Michael Gonzalez, William Gonzalez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/24/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff William Gonzalez pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770 as to County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Office. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/21/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants California Highway Patrol, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Office, Los Angeles Police Department, Michel Moore amending Complaint, filed by Plaintiffs Michael Gonzalez, William Gonzalez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/11/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Does, Michel Moore. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Michael Gonzalez, William Gonzalez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/4/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff William Gonzalez, upon Defendant Michel Moore served on 5/14/2021, answer due 6/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brian Hun, Authorized to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/14/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Michael Gonzalez, William Gonzalez, upon Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Office served on 5/17/2021, answer due 6/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Perez Argueta, Deputy Sheriff, Authorized to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/18/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Michael Gonzalez, William Gonzalez, upon Defendant Los Angeles Police Department served on 5/14/2021, answer due 6/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Valdivia, Deputy Clerk, Authorized to accept service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/14/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff William Gonzalez, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 5/14/2021, answer due 6/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ruben Khosdikian, Deputy Clerk, Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/14/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol, State Of California, identifying william gonzalez,michael gonzalez, county of los angeles, la county sheriffs office, la police, city of los angeles, michel moore, chief of police CHP. (Chu-Fujita, Betty) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol, State Of California, identifying william gonzalez,michael gonzalez, county of los angeles, la county sheriffs office, la police, city of los angeles, michel moore, chief of police CHP. (Chu-Fujita, Betty) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants California Highway Patrol, State Of California. (Chu-Fujita, Betty) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, case number 21STCV16790 Receipt No: ACACDC-33616096 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant California Highway Patrol, State Of California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Betty Chu-Fujita added to party California Highway Patrol(pty:dft), Attorney Betty Chu-Fujita added to party State Of California(pty:dft))(Chu-Fujita, Betty) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
