In Re PRM Family Holding Company, L.L.C.
| Dale Schian |
| El Chilerito Spice Co. Inc. |
| Jaimie Baker |
| PRM Family Holding Company, L.L.C. |
| 2:2022cv04771 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285). The Notice of Levy, etc. was returned executed upon HSBC Bank USA (El Chilerito Spice Co. Inc.) on 12/9/2022. Remarks: mailed on 12/9/22. (See attached proof of service for further details) (yl) |
| Filing 17 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285). The writ of execution was returned executed upon Bank of America (El Chilerito Spice Co. Inc.) on 10/26/2022. Remarks: n/a. (yl) |
| Filing 16 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of writ of execution returned executed upon Wells Fargo Bank on 9/7/22. Remarks: mailed on 9/7/2022. (yl) |
| Filing 15 Writ of Execution issued against El Chilerito Spice Co. Inc., a California Corporaton (yl) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Writ of Execution filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Execution) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: The amount(s) listed in writ/abstract do(es) not coincide with the amount(s) in the judgment/order. See Writ of Execution, See writ of execution, the amounts are not the same as on the Certification of Judgment. There are no amounts for interest found on the judgment. (lom) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Writ of Execution filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Execution) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY WRIT OF EXECUTION. The document is being returned to you for correction of: Entered date listed on the writ/abstract does not match the entered date of the judgment/order. (yl) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Writ of Execution filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Writ of Execution) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST for Writ of Writ of Execution filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Writ) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
Filing 8
ORDER APPOINTING PROCESS SERVER #6 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Court, having considered the Request for Appointment of Process server filed by Jaimie Baker, as assignee of plaintiff and judgment creditor Dale Schian, Creditor Trustee of the PRM Family Holding Company L.L.C. Creditor Trust and good cause appearing therefore, hereby orders as follows: 1. The Request is approved. 2. The Judgment Creditor may employ a registered private process server, specifically identified as Nationwide Legal, LLC, who employs California 26 registered process servers over 18 years of age and of suitable discretion, and who is not a party to this action. Nationwide Legal, LLC is authorized and appointed to serve any writs) of execution entered in this action. The U.S. Marshal shall remain the levying officer for any writs) of execution entered in this action. (yl)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:22-cv-04771-PSG-MAAx. The previous case number, 2:22-mc-00035-UA, is hereby terminated. (car) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Order for Request for Appointment of Process Server filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Appointing Process Server) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez GRANTING #4 Request to Substitute Attorney. Brett H. Ramsaur to substitute as counsel of record instead of Jaimie Baker (Pro Se). (yl)
|
| Filing 4 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Brett H. Ramsaur in place of attorney Jaimie Baker filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution or Withdrawal of Attorney) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Brett H. Ramsaur in place of attorney Jaimie Baker #2 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order. See court's website - forms for [Prop] Order that goes with the Request. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Brett H. Ramsaur in place of attorney Jaimie Baker filed by Judgment Creditor Jaimie Baker. (Attorney Brett H Ramsaur added to party Jaimie Baker(pty:mov)) (Ramsaur, Brett) |
| Filing 1 CERTIFICATION OF JUDGMENT received from United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona, case number 2:13-bk-09026-BKM entered in the sending district on 11/30/2021. Entered in this district on 2/16/2022, filed by Movant Jaimie Baker. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
