Xposure Photo Agency Inc. v. iHeartMedia, Inc.
| Xposure Photo Agency Inc. |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv04808 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| John E McDermott |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Having received the Defendant's waiver of service #12 and reviewed Plaintiff's response #13 , the Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Cause dated October 24, 2022 #11 . IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Xposure Photo Agency Inc.to Order to Show Cause,,,, #11 (Perkowski, Peter) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Xposure Photo Agency Inc.. upon iHeartMedia, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/12/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Holly DeKan, Corporate Counsel. (Perkowski, Peter) |
|
Filing 11
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). In the present case, it appears that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before October 31, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant iHeartMedia, Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Xposure Photo Agency Inc.. (Perkowski, Peter) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Xposure Photo Agency Inc.. (Perkowski, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Xposure Photo Agency Inc., identifying Xposure Photo Agency Inc. and iHeart Media, Inc.. (Perkowski, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Xposure Photo Agency Inc.. (Perkowski, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33627754 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Xposure Photo Agency Inc.. (Attorney Peter E Perkowski added to party Xposure Photo Agency Inc.(pty:pla))(Perkowski, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Xposure Photo Agency Inc. v. iHeartMedia, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Xposure Photo Agency Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter E Perkowski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: iHeartMedia, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
