The American Automobile Association, Inc. v. AAA Auto Service et al
Plaintiff: The American Automobile Association, Inc.
Defendant: Yazan Sharif, AAA Auto Service and Yazan Sharif doing business as AAA Auto Service
Case Number: 2:2022cv04878
Filed: July 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court grants a thirty day extension, to and including September 19, 2022, to allow time for the parties to reach a settlement.; granting #17 REQUEST for Extension of Time. (aco)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED that the Application for Permission for Electronic Filing by defendant Yazan Sharif is hereby GRANTED. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk.; granting #16 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. (aco)
August 12, 2022 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Yazan Sharif. RE: Extension of Time #17 served on 08/12/2022. (aco)
August 12, 2022 Filing 17 Extension of Time filed by Defendant Yazan Sharif. (aco) Modified on 8/15/2022 (aco).
August 12, 2022 Filing 16 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING filed by Defendant Yazan Sharif. (aco)
July 28, 2022 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc., upon Defendant AAA Auto Service served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022; Yazan Sharif served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Yazan Sharif in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Melnyk, Yurij)
July 21, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney on behalf of Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt)
July 21, 2022 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Neil K. Roman on behalf of Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
July 18, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ayana M. Lindsey. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh)
July 18, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Neil K. Roman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh)
July 18, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants AAA Auto Service, Yazan Sharif. (Attachments: #1 Yazan Sharif) (sh)
July 18, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
July 18, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
July 18, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh)
July 15, 2022 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc. (Melnyk, Yurij)
July 15, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Additional summons)(Melnyk, Yurij)
July 15, 2022 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by The American Automobile Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Complaint)(Melnyk, Yurij)
July 15, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc.. (Melnyk, Yurij)
July 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33641544 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff The American Automobile Association, Inc.. (Attorney Yurij Satish Das Melnyk added to party The American Automobile Association, Inc.(pty:pla))(Melnyk, Yurij)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The American Automobile Association, Inc. v. AAA Auto Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The American Automobile Association, Inc.
Represented By: Yurij Satish Das Melnyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yazan Sharif
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AAA Auto Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yazan Sharif doing business as AAA Auto Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?