Alireza Tabatabaeenejad v. United States Department of State et al
| ALIREZA TABATABAEENEJAD |
| United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Republic of Armenia, Antony Blinken and Lynne M. Tracy |
| 2:2022cv04881 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| John F Walter |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Antony Blinken answer now due 10/18/2022; U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Republic of Armenia answer now due 10/18/2022; United States Department of State answer now due 10/18/2022; Lynne M. Tracy answer now due 10/18/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Antony Blinken; U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Republic of Armenia; United States Department of State; Lynne M. Tracy.(Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party Antony Blinken(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party Lynne M. Tracy(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Republic of Armenia(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party United States Department of State(pty:dft))(Chapman, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alireza Tabatabaeenejad, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 7/26/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; Lynne M. Tracy served on 7/26/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Republic of Armenia served on 7/26/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; United States Department of State served on 7/26/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Oscar Ortiz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Justice Zosto. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Robert Martin. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mail Receipts)(Sullivan, Christina) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Antony Blinken, Lynne M. Tracy, U.S. Embassy in Yerevan, Republic of Armenia and United States Department of State. (jtil) |
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ALIREZA TABATABAEENEJAD, (Sullivan, Christina) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ALIREZA TABATABAEENEJAD. (Sullivan, Christina) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ALIREZA TABATABAEENEJAD. (Sullivan, Christina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33642455 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff ALIREZA TABATABAEENEJAD. (Attorney Christina Sullivan added to party ALIREZA TABATABAEENEJAD(pty:pla))(Sullivan, Christina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
