Frank Davis, Jr. v. Arc Point Labs West Los Angeles
| Frank Davis, Jr. |
| Arc Point Labs West Los Angeles |
| 2:2022cv04899 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Steve Kim |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, RE: #3 . Plaintiff shall file the information requested in the Courts July 26, 2022 order (Dkt. #7 ) by October 18, 2022. Failure to file the additional requested information by that date will result in dismissal. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge Cormac J. Carney, ORDERING Letter to the Judge submitted by Plaintiff Frank Davis, Jr received on 08/23/22 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 83-2.5 No letters to the judge. (rolm)
|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned addressed to Frank Davis Jr. re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 (rolm) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned addressed to Frank Davis Jr. re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 (rolm) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned addressed to Frank Davis Jr. re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 (rolm) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, On REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Prisoner Case) #3 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Frank Davis, Jr. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Frank Davis, Jr, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Arc Point Labs West Los Angeles. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Frank Davis, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frank Davis, Jr. v. Arc Point Labs West Los Angeles | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frank Davis, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arc Point Labs West Los Angeles | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
