FGH Investment LLC v. Mohammed Hanif et al
Plaintiff: FGH Investment LLC
Defendant: Mohammed Hanif, Sahin Sultana and Does 1 to 10, Inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv04925
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L Abrams
Referring Judge: John A Kronstadt
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2022 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles. (yl)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE NOTICE OF REMOVAL (DKT. 1) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the foregoing reasons, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the present action. Therefore, the action is REMANDED to the Los Angeles Superior Court, at its Chatsworth Courthouse, 9425 Penfield Ave, Chatsworth, CA 91311, Case No. 22CHUD00374. (See document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl)
July 21, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
July 21, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
July 21, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (car)
July 19, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Mohammed Hanif. (car)
July 19, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Sahin Sultana. (car)
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Mohammed Hanif, Sahin Sultana (car)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of Los Angeles, case number 22CHUD00374 with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, filed by Defendants Sahin Sultana, Mohammed Hanif. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FGH Investment LLC v. Mohammed Hanif et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FGH Investment LLC
Represented By: Michael C Earle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohammed Hanif
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sahin Sultana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?