David Daryl Jones v. Kilolo Kijakazi et al
| David Daryl Jones |
| Andrew Saul, Does 1 to 15 and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv04941 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The Court denied Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis on the basis that the Complaint failed to state a claim and that the Court could not confirm whether it has subject-matter jurisdiction over the action. The Court invited Plaintiff to submit a First Amended Complaint to address the Court's concerns #4 . Plaintiff submitted a First Amended Complaint that does not resolve theseissues #5 . The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff may satisfy this Order by filing one or both of the following within 30 days: (1) a Second Amended Complaint alleging facts showing the Appeals Council reviewed the Administrative Law Judges decision and stating the date of the Appeals Councils decision, or (2) a copy of the Appeals Council decision. Failure to file a timely and satisfactory response will result in dismissal of this action. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi amending Complaint - (Social Security) #1 , filed by Plaintiff David Daryl Jones(hr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order. (lom)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David Daryl Jones. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Does, Andrew Saul. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Filed by Plaintiff David Daryl Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/20/2022) (rsm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
