Caughell Enterprises, Inc. v. Financial Indemnity Company
Plaintiff: Caughell Enterprises, Inc. dba Service Master Anytime and Caughell Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Service Master Anytime
Defendant: Financial Indemnity Company and ROES
Case Number: 2:2022cv05121
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2022 Filing 17 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to parties settled filed by Plaintiff Caughell Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Cochran, Joan)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Having considered the Notice of Settlement #13 and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS: 1. All deadlines governing this action are VACATED. 2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 60 days from the date of this Order. 3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require approval of the court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
September 6, 2022 Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Notice (Other) #13 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is accepted as filed. (hc)
September 1, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice : Settlement. Case number incomplete. Missing assigned Judge and Magistrate's initials. Correct case number is to read as: 2:22-cv-05121-FLA-JEMx Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
August 31, 2022 Filing 13 Notice filed by Plaintiff Caughell Enterprises, Inc.. (Cochran, Joan)
August 8, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of address by Jason P Tortorici attorney for Defendant Financial Indemnity Company. Changing attorneys address to 21361 Pacific Coast Hwy, suite A, Malibu, CA 90265. Filed by Defendant Financial Indemnity Company. (Tortorici, Jason)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
July 27, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Consent to Magistrate of Financial Indemnity Company re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 (Tortorici, Jason)
July 27, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Financial Indemnity Company. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,, #1 Correction of Ex. 12 and 13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corrected Ex. 12 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Corrected Ex. 13 to Notice of Removal)(Tortorici, Jason)
July 26, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
July 26, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
July 26, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil)
July 25, 2022 CROSS Complaint filed by Plaintiff Caughell Enterprises, Inc. in Santa Barbara Superior Court on 3/14/2022, attached as Exhibit 1. [See Dismissal of Enloe Complaint attached to Removal as Exhibit 3]. (jtil) Modified on 7/26/2022 (jtil).
July 25, 2022 Filing 4 Financial Indemnity Company's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Financial Indemnity Company, identifying Kemper Insurance Company; Financial Indemnity Company. (Tortorici, Jason)
July 25, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Financial Indemnity Company. (Tortorici, Jason)
July 25, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 to Complaint of Caughell Enterprises, Inc. filed by Defendant Financial Indemnity Company. (Tortorici, Jason) Modified on 7/26/2022 (jtil).
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court California Santa Barbara County, case number 21CV01903 Receipt No: ACACDC-33687780 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Financial Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- summons and complaint, #2 Exhibit 2- notice of partial settlement, #3 Exhibit 3-dismissal of Enloe Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4-Opposition to motion to sever, #5 Exhibit 5-order of 7-6-22, #6 Exhibit 6-Enloe Complaint, #7 Exhibit 7-SBSC case information, #8 Exhibit 8-CEI answer to complaint, #9 Exhibit 9-demurrer, #10 Exhibit 10 - notice of hearing on demurrer, #11 Exhibit 11- memorandum of points and authorities in support of demurrer, #12 Exhibit 12 - request for judicial notice in support of demurrer, #13 Exhibit 13 - Declaration in support of demurrer, #14 Exhibit 14 - motion to strike punitive damages, #15 Exhibit 15 - Motion to sever, #16 Exhibit 16 - Opposition to demurrer, #17 Exhibit 17 - Opposition to Motion to strike, #18 Exhibit 18 - Reply to Opposition to demurrer, #19 Exhibit 19 - Reply to Opposition to motion to strike, #20 Exhibit 20 - Reply to opposition to motion to sever, #21 Exhibit 21- opposition to request for judicial notice, #22 Exhibit 22 - case management order) (Attorney Jason P Tortorici added to party Financial Indemnity Company(pty:dft))(Tortorici, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caughell Enterprises, Inc. v. Financial Indemnity Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caughell Enterprises, Inc. dba Service Master Anytime
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caughell Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Service Master Anytime
Represented By: Jeffrey Thomas Bolson
Represented By: Joan Elaine Cochran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Financial Indemnity Company
Represented By: Jason P Tortorici
Represented By: Anthony Carsten Kohrs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?