Albert Chow v. Enochian Biosciences Inc. et al
| Albert Chow |
| Enochian Biosciences Inc., Mark Dybul, Luisa Puche, Rene Sindlev, Carol L. Brosgart, Gregg Alton, James Sapirstein, Carl Sandler, Henrik Gronfeldt Sorensen, Jayne McNicol and Evelyn DAn |
| 2:2022cv05147 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Alexander F. MacKinnon. New Case Number 8:22-cv-01374 DMG (AFMx). (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Albert Chow. (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Albert Chow, (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Albert Chow. (Pafiti, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33694683 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Albert Chow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification, #2 Exhibit Schedule A) (Attorney Jennifer Pafiti added to party Albert Chow(pty:pla))(Pafiti, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
