Art Records, LLC v. Youtube, LLC et al
| Art Records, LLC |
| Youtube, LLC, Google, LLC, Believe, Meypom Muzik Yapim As, Sahin Ozer Muzik Yapim Ve Tic. A.S., Soner Muzik, Avrupa Muzik, Odeon Muzik, Super Muzik, Bonus Muzik, Tempa-Foneks, Anadolu Muzik Yapim, Kalite Muzik Uretim Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti., Netd Muzik Video Dijital Plaform A.S., Emre Grafson Muzik, Dogan Muzik Yapim, Pasaj Muzik, Ossi Muzik, Orchard Media, Inc., Poll Production, Oncu Muzik, Sony (Turkiye) Muzik Ve Sanat A.S., Ulus Muzik San, A1 Music Production Industry Trade Limited Company, 1 Music Distribution Group of Companies, Ozer Kardes Kaset, Universal Music Turkey, Emi Ken Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S., DOES 1-10 and Sony Turkiye Muzik Ve Sanat A.S. |
| M-Yap Balantl Hak Sahibi Fonogram Yapmclar MeslekBirlii |
| 2:2022cv05179 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 55
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 60 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) #53 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court having received and considered the Stipulation of Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, and defendant M-Yap Balantl Hak Sahibi Fonogram Yapmclar MeslekBirlii (Mu-Yap) and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for defendant Mu-Yap to respond to the Complaint be and hereby is extended to the later of (i) January 9, 2023, and (ii) 21-days from the date that Plaintiff amends its Complaints if Plaintiff amends prior to January 9, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
|
|
Filing 54
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #53 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court having received and considered the Stipulation of plaintiff Art Records, LLC, and defendant Orchard Media, Inc., and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for defendant Orchard Media, Inc. to respond to the Complaint be and hereby is extended to the later of (i) January 9, 2023, and (ii) 21-days from the date that Plaintiff amends its Complaint if Plaintiff amends prior to January 9, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
|
| Filing 53 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 9, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Orchard Media, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Peter) |
|
Filing 52
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fisch GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint #51 . The Defendants Google, LLC and Youtube, LLC deadline to file a response to the Complaint shall be continued until 1/9/2023. (jp)
|
| Filing 51 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 9, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ghajar, Bobby) |
| Filing 50 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant M-Yap Balantl Hak Sahibi Fonogram Yapmclar MeslekBirlii.(Attorney Armen Shaghzo added to party M-Yap Balantl Hak Sahibi Fonogram Yapmclar MeslekBirlii (pty:bkmov))(Shaghzo, Armen) |
| Filing 49 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Tempa-Foneks served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Tempa-Foneks in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendant Tempa-Foneks)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 48 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Soner Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Soner Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 47 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Sahin Ozer Muzik Yapim Ve Tic. A.S. served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Sahin Ozer Muzik Yapim Ve Tic. A.S. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 46 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Pasaj Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Pasaj Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 45 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Ossi Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Ossi Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 44 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Odeon Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Odeon Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 43 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Netd Muzik Video Dijital Plaform A.S. served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Netd Muzik Video Dijital Plaform A.S. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 42 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Meypom Muzik Yapim As served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Meypom Muzik Yapim AS. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 41 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Emre Grafson Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Emre Grafson Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 40 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Emi Ken Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Emi Ken Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 39 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Dogan Muzik Yapim served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Dogan Muzik Yapim in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 38 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Bonus Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Bonus Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 37 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Avrupa Muzik served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Avrupa Muzik in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 36 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Anadolu Muzik Yapim served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Anadolu Muzik Yapim in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 35 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant A1 Music Production Industry Trade Limited Company served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant A1 Music Production Industry Trade Limited Company in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email to Defendant re Service)(Burroughs, Scott) |
|
Filing 34
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint #31 until 11/23/2022. See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Authorizing Alternate Means of Service on Defendants #29 . The following is hereby Ordered: (1) Plaintiff's ex parte application for leave to effect service of process onDefendants via alternative means is GRANTED. See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint #31 to 11/23/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 31 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Orchard Media, Inc. answer now due 11/23/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Orchard Media, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vallens, Adrian) |
| Filing 30 Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 11/23/2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ghajar, Bobby) |
| Filing 29 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for AUTHORIZING ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Frank R. Trechsel, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Proposed Order) (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Document Nos. #25 and #27 were not properly flattened. The clerk will replace with flattened versions. (jp) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint #26 to 10/24/2022. (jp) (Main Document 27 replaced on 10/13/2022) (jp).
|
| Filing 26 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 24, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Orchard Media, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Peter) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint #24 , that Defendants Google LLC and YouTube, LLC's deadline to file a response to the Complaint shall be continued 10/24/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 24 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 10/24/2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ghajar, Bobby) |
| Filing 23 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Youtube, LLC answer now due 9/22/2022; Google, LLC answer now due 9/22/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Youtube, LLC; Google, LLC.(Dunning, Angela) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC, identifying Google LLC, XXVI Holdings Inc., and Alphabet Inc.. (Dunning, Angela) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jessica McCarthy Williams on behalf of Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC (Attorney Jessica McCarthy Williams added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Jessica McCarthy Williams added to party Youtube, LLC(pty:dft))(Williams, Jessica) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Colette Ani Ghazarian on behalf of Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC (Attorney Colette Ani Ghazarian added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Colette Ani Ghazarian added to party Youtube, LLC(pty:dft))(Ghazarian, Colette) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Judd David Lauter on behalf of Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC (Attorney Judd David Lauter added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Judd David Lauter added to party Youtube, LLC(pty:dft))(Lauter, Judd) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Angela L Dunning on behalf of Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC (Attorney Angela L Dunning added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Angela L Dunning added to party Youtube, LLC(pty:dft))(Dunning, Angela) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bobby A. Ghajar on behalf of Defendants Google, LLC, Youtube, LLC (Attorney Bobby A. Ghajar added to party Google, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Bobby A. Ghajar added to party Youtube, LLC(pty:dft))(Ghajar, Bobby) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Orchard Media, Inc. answer now due 9/22/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Orchard Media, Inc..(Attorney Peter J. Anderson added to party Orchard Media, Inc.(pty:dft))(Anderson, Peter) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Google, LLC served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation Service Company c/o Lynanne Gares\Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Orchard Media, Inc. served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation Service Company c/o Lynanne Gares\Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, upon Defendant Youtube, LLC served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation Service Company c/o Lynanne Gares\Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 1 Music Distribution Group of Companies, A1 Music Production Industry Trade Limited Company, Anadolu Muzik Yapim, Avrupa Muzik, Believe, Bonus Muzik, Dogan Muzik Yapim, Emi Ken Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S., Emre Grafson Muzik, Google, LLC, Kalite Muzik Uretim Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti., Meypom Muzik Yapim As, Netd Muzik Video Dijital Plaform A.S., Odeon Muzik, Oncu Muzik, Orchard Media, Inc., Ossi Muzik, Ozer Kardes Kaset, Pasaj Muzik, Poll Production, Sahin Ozer Muzik Yapim Ve Tic. A.S., Soner Muzik, Sony Turkiye Muzik Ve Sanat A.S., Super Muzik, Tempa-Foneks, Ulus Muzik San, Universal Music Turkey, Youtube, LLC. (jp) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
|
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. If party names do not fit in the "To" space provided, enter only the name of the first party and write see attached No. 2, then attach a list or addendum to summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Art Records, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC, (Attachments: #1 Supplement CV-30 - Attachment #1)(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33700634 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Art Records, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint) (Attorney Scott A. Burroughs added to party Art Records, LLC(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
