Leida Vega v. Continental Credit Control, Inc.
| Leida Vega |
| Continental Credit Control, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv05255 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Steve Kim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 9 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassign Pursuant to General Order 12-02 filed on 9/1/2022. The case number will now read CV 22-5255-DMG (SKx). Additional information about Judge Gee's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Auderos to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-05255 DMG(SKx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Leida Vega. (Veggian, Lauren) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Continental Credit Control, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 CV11-C) (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leida Vega, (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leida Vega. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leida Vega. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33717314 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Leida Vega. (Attorney Michael Frederick Cardoza added to party Leida Vega(pty:pla))(Cardoza, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leida Vega v. Continental Credit Control, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leida Vega | |
| Represented By: | Michael Frederick Cardoza |
| Represented By: | Lauren B Veggian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Continental Credit Control, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
