Radik Karapetyan v. J. Engleman
| Warden J. Engleman |
| Radik Karapetyan |
| J. Engleman |
| 2:2022cv05291 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241 #7 . The Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Petitioner's opposition, or notice of non-opposition, to the Motion to Dismiss must be served and filed by October 10, 2022. 2. Respondent may file a reply to Petitioner's opposition to a Motion to Dismiss within fourteen (14) days of the date the opposition is filed. 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Motion will be taken under submission, without oral argument, when briefing is complete, and the parties will be notified by mail or email of all further proceedings. [See Order for further details.] (es)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241 filed by Respondent J. Engleman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Yolanda Sanchez) (Namazi, Siobhan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, Granting #5 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Petition. The Respondent shall file a motion to dismiss, if applicable, on or before September 7, 2022. If the Respondent does not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioner's claims, then Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the Petition on or before September 14, 2022. (es)
|
| Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 9/7/2022 filed by Respondent J. Engleman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Namazi, Siobhan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Siobhan M. Namazi (DOJ Trial Attorney) on behalf of Respondent J. Engleman. (Attorney Siobhan Maria Namazi added to party J. Engleman(pty:res))(Namazi, Siobhan) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (FEDERAL CUSTODY) by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. (es)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241), filed by Petitioner Radik Karapetyan. Case assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (Filing fee $ 5 Paid.) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
