Anselmo Portillo et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Anselmo Portillo and Norma Portillo |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv05356 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to case settled filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 30
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 68 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Pursuant to Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo and Norma Portillo's acceptance of Defendant Ford Motor Company's Offer of Judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the sum of $45,000.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing 29
NOTICE of Offer of Judgment filed by Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo. Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo and Norma Portillo's Notice of Acceptance of Defendant Ford Motor Company's Offer of Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. CIV. P. 68 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment Pursuant to Federal rule of Civil Procedure 68)(Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE of Offer of Judgment filed by Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo. Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo and Norma Portillo's Notice of Acceptance of Defendant Ford Motor Company's Offer of Judgment Pursuant to FED. R. CIV.P. 68 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 27
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph A Kaufman counsel for Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo. Gavin Holland is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Norma Portillo and Anselmo Portillo. (Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 26
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. Plaintiffs Anselmo and Norma Portillo move to remand this action to state court. Defendant Ford Motor Company opposed the motion, and Plaintiffs filed a reply, The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. This court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case, and removal was timely. Plaintiffs' motion to remand and request for attorney's fees is hereby DENIED. (lc)
|
|
Filing 25
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court has revised its procedures regarding mandatory chambers copies in civil cases newly assigned to Judge Scarsi. The Court authorizes the parties to this case to follow the new procedures in lieu of the procedures stated in Initial Standing Order 9(e). More information about the new procedures is available at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-mark-c-scarsi THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2023 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 8/8/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 05/15/23. (dbe)
|
|
Filing 22
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2023 02:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 8/8/2023 08:30 AM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 21
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on October 24, 2022 at 9:00 a.m is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 20
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. #12 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion, noticed for hearing on October 24, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST for Leave of Douglas Proudfoot to Appear for Motion to Remand and Scheduling Conference Telephonically filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company #18 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
|
Filing 18
REQUEST for Leave of Douglas Proudfoot to Appear for Motion to Remand and Scheduling Conference Telephonically filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Request set for hearing on 10/24/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Proudfoot, Douglas)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Douglas A Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Attorney Douglas A Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Douglas)
|
|
Filing 16
REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo and Norma Portillo's Reply to Defendant Ford Motor Company's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo and Norma Portillo's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Matthew M. Proudfoot in Support of Ford's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand)(Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 15
Opposition in opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Dec MMP ISO Ford Opposition to Plf Motion to Remand, #2 Ford's Responses to Plf Objection to Dec of MMP ISO Notice of Removal)(Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 14
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court, on its own motion, continues the scheduling conference from September 26, 2022 to October 24, 2022,at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. This will be an in-person hearing. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
|
Filing 13
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiffs Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo.. (Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo. Motion set for hearing on 10/24/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gavin Holland in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Matthew M. Proudfoot, #3 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order) (Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 11
Plaintiffs NOTICE of Interested Parties (Kaufman, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et)
|
|
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/22/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 #1 ]. (et)
|
|
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive., filed by Plaintiff Anselmo Portillo, Norma Portillo. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/22/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 #1 ]. (et)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, identifying Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 22NWCV00500 Receipt No: ACACDC-33733542 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
