Christina Repola v. First Unum Life Insurance Company
Christina Repola |
First Unum Life Insurance Company |
2:2022cv05445 |
August 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
John F Walter |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Christina Repola. upon First Unum Life Insurance Company waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Grant E. Ingram. (Roberts, Michelle) |
Filing 11 DECLARATION of Michelle L. Roberts Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Christina Repola. (Roberts, Michelle) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christina Repola, identifying Christina Repola. (Roberts, Michelle) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant First Unum Life Insurance Company. (car) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Christina Repola. (Roberts, Michelle) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christina Repola. (Roberts, Michelle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33751209 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Christina Repola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit LTD Policy) (Attorney Michelle Lee Roberts added to party Christina Repola(pty:pla))(Roberts, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Christina Repola v. First Unum Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christina Repola | |
Represented By: | Michelle Lee Roberts |
Represented By: | Monica Lienke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: First Unum Life Insurance Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.