Jean Paul Nataf v. Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. et al
| Jean Paul Nataf |
| Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc., LAD-MB, LLC dba MERCEDES-BENZ OF DTLA and LAD-MB, LLC a limited liability company doing business as Mercedes Benz of DTLA |
| 2:2022cv05482 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/11/2022. (tj)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant LAD-MB, LLC d/b/a MERCEDES-BENZ OF DTLA LAD-MB, LLC, (Leach, Brian) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant LAD-MB, LLC d/b/a MERCEDES-BENZ OF DTLA LAD-MB, LLC.(Attorney Brian E Leach added to party LAD-MB, LLC(pty:dft))(Leach, Brian) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jean Paul Nataf. upon Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/11/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Attorney Colm A. Moran. (Horstmann, John) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc., and LAD-MB, LLC. (Attachments: #1 LAD MB) (jtil) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (hc)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jean Paul Nataf. (Ginter, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jean Paul Nataf. (Ginter, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jean Paul Nataf, (Ginter, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jean Paul Nataf. (Ginter, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33755366 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jean Paul Nataf. (Attorney Brian S Ginter added to party Jean Paul Nataf(pty:pla))(Ginter, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
