South Bay Associates of SoCal, LLC v. Errol Townsend et al
South Bay Associates of SoCal, LLC |
Errol Townsend, Erik Townsend and Does 1 to 10 inclusive |
2:2022cv05505 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
George H Wu |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal- Remand to Superior Court (rolm) |
Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (aco) |
Filing 11 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California listed above, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (aco) |
Filing 10 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because the District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. This case is REMANDED to the state court as explained in the attached statement.; denying #8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (aco) |
Filing 9 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that as explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. This case is REMANDED to the state court as explained in the attached statement.;denying #3 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (aco) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error document was not attached to docket entry Re: APPLICATION to Proceed In in district court without prepaying fees or Costs. Application will be re-docketed. (car) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by Defendant Errol Townsend. (car) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by Defendant Erik Townsend. (car) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Errol Townsend, Erik Townsend (car) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of Los Angeles, case number 22CMUD00588 with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, filed by Defendants Erik Townsend, Errol Townsend. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Notice of Removal, #1 filed by Defendants Errol Townsend, Erik Townsend. Filed in State Court on 7/5/2022 Submitted with pg 10 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
[NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/11/2022, SEE ITEM 7] APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by Defendant Errol Townsend. (car) Modified on 8/11/2022 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.