Spirit Clothing Company v. Exist, Inc.
Plaintiff: Spirit Clothing Company
Defendant: Exist, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv05538
Filed: August 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2022 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Exist, Inc..(Worthington, Brian)
September 28, 2022 Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Exist, Inc. answer now due 10/3/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Exist, Inc..(Worthington, Brian)
September 14, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Exist, Inc. answer now due 9/28/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Exist, Inc..(Attorney Brian P Worthington added to party Exist, Inc.(pty:dft))(Worthington, Brian)
August 26, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company, upon Defendant Exist, Inc. served on 8/24/2022, answer due 9/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joshua Glickman, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holbrow, Willmore)
August 8, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Exist, Inc.. (sh)
August 8, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
August 8, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
August 8, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh)
August 5, 2022 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Spirit Clothing Company. (Holbrow, Willmore)
August 5, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company, (Holbrow, Willmore)
August 5, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company. (Holbrow, Willmore)
August 5, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company. (Holbrow, Willmore)
August 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33765353 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company. (Attorney Willmore F Holbrow, III added to party Spirit Clothing Company(pty:pla))(Holbrow, Willmore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spirit Clothing Company v. Exist, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spirit Clothing Company
Represented By: Willmore F Holbrow, III
Represented By: Willmore F. Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exist, Inc.
Represented By: Brian P Worthington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?