Spirit Clothing Company v. Exist, Inc.
Spirit Clothing Company |
Exist, Inc. |
2:2022cv05538 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Alka Sagar |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Exist, Inc..(Worthington, Brian) |
Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Exist, Inc. answer now due 10/3/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Exist, Inc..(Worthington, Brian) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Exist, Inc. answer now due 9/28/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Exist, Inc..(Attorney Brian P Worthington added to party Exist, Inc.(pty:dft))(Worthington, Brian) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company, upon Defendant Exist, Inc. served on 8/24/2022, answer due 9/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joshua Glickman, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holbrow, Willmore) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Exist, Inc.. (sh) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Spirit Clothing Company. (Holbrow, Willmore) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company, (Holbrow, Willmore) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company. (Holbrow, Willmore) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company. (Holbrow, Willmore) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33765353 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Spirit Clothing Company. (Attorney Willmore F Holbrow, III added to party Spirit Clothing Company(pty:pla))(Holbrow, Willmore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Spirit Clothing Company v. Exist, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Spirit Clothing Company | |
Represented By: | Willmore F Holbrow, III |
Represented By: | Willmore F. Holbrow, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Exist, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian P Worthington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.