Zhiyun Yang v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Zhiyun Yang |
| Ur M. Jaddou, Susan M. Curda and Corina Luna |
| 2:2022cv05540 |
| August 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Susan M. Curda, Ur M. Jaddou, Corina Luna. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff ZHIYUN YANG, (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ZHIYUN YANG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ZHIYUN YANG. (Spence, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33765456 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff ZHIYUN YANG. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party ZHIYUN YANG(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
