Andrew Maria v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura
| Andrew Maria |
| Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura |
| 2:2022cv05582 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND VACATING ENTERED DEFAULT (ECF NO. 15) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court cannot conclude that the Board has been served with process. Therefore, the default entered on September 23, 2022 [Dkt 13] must be, and is, VACATED. As there is no basis for entering a default judgment against Defendant Board, the Motion also must be, and is, DENIED. Denying #15 MOTION for Default Judgment. [See Order for further details.] (es)
|
| Filing 15 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura filed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria. (Maria, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 [DEFAULT VACATED SEE DKT. #16 ] DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura (es) Modified on 10/6/2022 (es). |
| Filing 13 Second NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura filed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria. (Maria, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe - Employee/Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Amendment to cure noted deficiency. (Maria, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura #10 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. Although cited California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service, JANE DOE, authorized employee, is incomplete, missing physical description. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (es) |
| Filing 10 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura filed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria. (Maria, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria, upon Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura served on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe / Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Maria, Andrew) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: Granting #5 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (es)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. See Order for details. (es)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria. Related Case(s): 2:22-cv-5105 MCS (GJS); 2:22-cv-05383-SB (MAR); and 2:22-cv-05645-SB (GJS) (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Andrew Maria against Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Filing fee $402 Paid.) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrew Maria v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew Maria | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
