Matthew D. Cinquanta v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles
Plaintiff: Matthew D. Cinquanta
Defendant: Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Case Number: 2:2022cv05645
Filed: August 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
2 Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DIRECTING THAT DOCUMENT [Dkt. 24] BE STRICKEN, DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CEASE SUBMITTING REPETITIVE DOCUMENTS, AND REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: re: First Amended Complaint #24 . Despite having been advised of his violation of Rule 15(a)(2), Plaintiff still has not sought, nor obtained, leave to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED TO STRIKE Docket No. 24. Plaintiff is ORDERED to cease repetitively filing his First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief unless and until he has obtained leave to do so from the Court. [See Order for details.] (es)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 [STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT SEE DKT. #25 ] FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF against Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta (es) Modified on 10/7/2022 (es).
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Amended Complaint #19 by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. The document is STRICKEN. (es)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: First Amended Complaint #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 no proof of service attached. Other error(s) with document(s): Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) amended complaint is untimely and no leave has been obtained.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: First Amended Complaint #16 by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. The document is STRICKEN. (es)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: First Amended Complaint #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 no proof of service attached. Other error(s) with document(s): Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) amended complaint is untimely and no leave has been obtained. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DIRECTING THAT DOCUMENT [Dkt. 15] BE STRICKEN AND REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICE REQUIREMENTS by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: re: Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #15 . Plaintiff submitted the Opposition for filing through the EDSS procedure, which in turn requires that it be filed by the Clerk's Office on his behalf. Thus, the above-quoted representation as to service on Defendant's counsel set forth in the Opposition cannot be correct. As the Opposition has not been served on Defendants counsel, Plaintiff has violated Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and the Court's Initial Order. Accordingly, the Clerk's Office is directed to STRIKE the Opposition [Dkt. 15]. Plaintiff may resubmit the Opposition for filing through EDSS (or by mail) as long as it contains a proof of service establishing that service on Defendant's counsel actually occurred. [See Order for further details.] (es)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta, re First Amended Complaint #16 served on 10/4/22. (es)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 [STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT SEE DKT. #21 ] FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF against Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta(es) Modified on 10/6/2022 (es).
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 [STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT SEE DKT. #23 ] FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF against Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta(es) Modified on 10/6/2022 (es).
October 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT SEE DKT. #18 ] Plaintiff's OPPOSITION to Defendant's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta. (es) Modified on 10/5/2022 (es).
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING HEARING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 . The October 7, 2022 hearing is VACATED. Pursuant to this Order, Plaintiff shall file and serve his Opposition to the Motion by no later than October 2, 2022. Within 15 days of service of the Opposition, Defendant may file and serve a Reply. [See Order for further details.] (es)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 10/7/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF TAYLOR J. POHLE ISO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES MOTION TO DISMISS BASED IN FRCP 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6), #2 Exhibit DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS BASED IN FRCP 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6), #3 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO THE COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF MATTHEW CINQUANTA) (Attorney Taylor Joseph Pohle added to party Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles(pty:dft)) (Pohle, Taylor)
August 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta, re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) - optional html form #4 served on 8/24/2022. (es)
August 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta, upon Board of Supervisors of the County of L.A. Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed on 8/12/2022 upon Deputy Clerk Bruce Crouchet in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (es)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: Granting #8 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (es)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta, upon Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles served on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Deputy Clerk Bruce Crouchet in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (es)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta. (es)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:22-cv-05105 MCS(GJS). Case transferred from Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-05645 MCS(GJS). Signed by Judge Mark C. Scarsi (rn)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES [PRO SE PLAINTIFF] by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Under General Order 05-07, this case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for pre-trial proceedings. Where this Order imposes a requirement that differs from Judge Standish's Procedures, which are available on the Courts website, this Order governs. [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] (et)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles. (lh)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta, (lh)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (Filing Fee $402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Matthew D. Cinquanta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthew D. Cinquanta v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew D. Cinquanta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Represented By: Brian K Stewart
Represented By: Taylor Joseph Pohle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?