Warren Johnson v. Bank of America et al
| Warren Johnson |
| Bank of America and U S Bank |
| 2:2022cv05679 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton DENYING REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 because: The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the followings: File an amended complaint which cures the problem described in the attached statement. (jp)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Warren Johnson. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Warren Johnson, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Bank of America, U S Bank. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Filed by Plaintiff Warren Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
