Mattel, Inc. v. Rap Snacks, Inc.
| Mattel, Inc. |
| Rap Snacks, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv05702 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Notice) (iv) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Mattel, Inc.. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Brenner, Lee) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Meaghan Kent to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Mattel, Inc., designating Lee Brenner as local counsel #11 . (iv)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Meaghan H. Kent to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Mattel, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33812121) filed by Plaintiff Mattel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sharon, Alicia) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Meaghan H. Kent. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Rap Snacks, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Mattel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brenner, Lee) |
| Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mattel, Inc., (Brenner, Lee) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mattel, Inc.. (Brenner, Lee) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mattel, Inc.. (Brenner, Lee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33798662 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Mattel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Lee S Brenner added to party Mattel, Inc.(pty:pla))(Brenner, Lee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
