Elizabeth Thomas et al v. BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC et al
Elizabeth Thomas, Lakewood Shampoo and Moreno LLC |
BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC and Galaxy Security Company Inc. |
2:2022cv05797 |
August 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: The Initial Complaint was filed 8/13/2022, ECF No., additional complaint cannot be filed within the same case.; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: Complaint #14 , Summons Request #15 . (iv) |
Filing 17 Mail Returned addressed to Elizabeth Thomas re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program #6 . (iv) |
Filing 15 **STRICKEN** Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint #14 filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (iv) Modified on 9/28/2022 Per Order #16 (iv). |
Filing 14 **STRICKEN** COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (iv) Modified on 9/28/2022 Per Order #16 (iv). |
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Possession of Property #3 is taken off calendar. No appearance necessary. The Court orders Plaintiff to pay the required filing fee and execute valid summons onto defendant by October 16, 2022. Failure to comply will merit dismissal of this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett, ORDERING Ex Parte Application and exhibit submitted by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas received on 8/30/2022 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: L.R. 7-19.1 Notice to other parties of ex parte application lacking. (iv) |
Filing 12 Mail Returned addressed to Elizabeth Thomas re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 (rolm) |
Filing 11 Mail Returned addressed to Elizabeth Thomas re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 (rolm) |
Filing 9 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #4 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The Request is DENIED because the filer has the ability to pay. (iv) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (sh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF MOTION for Order OF POSSESSION OF PROPERTY filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (sh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas, (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants BV Lakewood Carson SE LLC, Galaxy Security Company Inc..Case assigned to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue.(Filing fee $ 402) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Praecipe) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.