Kyle Harper v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kyle Harper
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv05874
Filed: August 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Sherilyn Peace Garnett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CIVIL PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett.Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/20/2023 at 3:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 10/10/2023 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet) (iv)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDER FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (iv)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/16/2023. (iv)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the October 26, 2022, Scheduling Conference. Trial Order to be issued. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 12, 2022 Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Joint 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan)(Payer, James)
August 19, 2022 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties,, #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 , Corporate Disclosure Statement,, #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 served on August 19, 2022. (Payer, James)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/12/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
August 19, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
August 19, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 19, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap)
August 18, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Kyle Harper. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/15/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
August 18, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kyle Harper, upon Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation served on 7/19/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Northrop Grumman Corporation, 330 N Brand Blvd 700, Glendale, CA 91203-2300 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/21/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap)
August 18, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation. (FILED IN STATE COURT 8/17/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap)
August 18, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation, identifying 1. Plaintiff Kyle Harper; 2. Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation; 3. Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation - Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a publicly traded company. State Street Bank and Trust Company owns approximately 11.0% of Northrop Grumman Corporation. There is no other publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock.. (Payer, James)
August 18, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation identifying Defendant NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, erroneously sued and served as NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION (Defendant), certifies that Defendant is a wholly owned subsidiary of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a publicly traded company. State Street Bank and Trust Company owns approximately 11.0% of Northrop Grumman Corporation. There is no other publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock. as Corporate Parent. (Payer, James)
August 18, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation. (Payer, James)
August 18, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV22851 Receipt No: ACACDC-33838341 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of James Payer) (Attorney James Elliot Bangert Payer added to party Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation(pty:dft))(Payer, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kyle Harper v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle Harper
Represented By: Jay S Rothman
Represented By: Kenneth R Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Represented By: James Elliot Bangert Payer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Represented By: Craig Gerald Staub
Represented By: James Elliot Bangert Payer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?