David Diaz v. Ford Motor Company et al
| David Diaz |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv05876 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. In light of the parties' Notice of Settlement, the Court ordered the parties to file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 by December 1, 2022. (ECF #11 .) The Court noted that "[f]ailure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action." Having received no response to the Court's Order, this case is hereby DISMISSED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of the parties' Notice of Settlement #10 , indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed on inactive status. By December 1, 2022, the parties shall file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement and order filed by Plaintiff David Diaz. (Haddad, Jerry) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(2), the Order required the parties to file a joint report at least 7 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference.To date, the parties have not filed a joint report. Accordingly, the Court VACATES theScheduling Conference. The Court ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by October 24, 2022, why: 1) they have not complied with the Courts Order, or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 2) the Court should not sanction the parties. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a satisfactory Rule 26(f) Report. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution or further sanctions without further notice/ (lc)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for October 24, 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who havepending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff David Diaz. Filed in State Court on 6/17/2022 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Filed in State Court on 8/16/2022 Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Mortenson, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Mortenson, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 22STCV19920 Receipt No: ACACDC-33838558 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Mortenson, #2 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #3 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #4 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of M. Mortenson) (Attorney Michael Donn Mortenson added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Mortenson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
