Elat Supermarket et al v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Elat Supermarket, Keyvan Novinbakht, Farhad Kamani and Faramarz Rabikashi |
United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service |
2:2022cv05949 |
August 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Alka Sagar |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. (aco) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-05949 PA(AGRx). (rn) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS filed by Plaintiffs Elat Supermarket, Farhad Kamani, Keyvan Novinbakht, Faramarz Rabikashi re: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 (Nejadpour, Fari) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet, No. 8 Supplement Related Parties and No. 9 Supplement Summons should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION ELAT MARKET Receipt No: ACACDC-33852392 - Fee: $402. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Federal Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Violation Letter, #3 Exhibit Right to Appeal, #4 Exhibit Acceptance of Administrative Hearing, #5 Exhibit Request for an Extension, #6 Exhibit Notice of Permanent Disqualification, #7 Exhibit Copy of Intent to Sue Letter, #8 Supplement Related Parties, #9 Supplement Summons [Draft]) (Attorney Fari Bari Nejadpour added to party Elat Supermarket(pty:pla), Attorney Fari Bari Nejadpour added to party Farhad Kamani(pty:pla), Attorney Fari Bari Nejadpour added to party Keyvan Novinbakit(pty:pla), Attorney Fari Bari Nejadpour added to party Faramarz Rabikashi(pty:pla))(Nejadpour, Fari) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.