Brendon Waters v. AMC Networks, Inc et al
| Brendon Waters |
| AMC Networks, Inc, WE TV, Entertainment One, Ltd, Tammy R Williams, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, Datari Turner Productions, Tammy Rivera Williams and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv05959 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Brendon Waters. (Williams, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brendon Waters, (Williams, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brendon Waters. (Williams, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33855826 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Brendon Waters. (Attorney Andrew Williams added to party Brendon Waters(pty:pla))(Williams, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
