Southern California Edison Company et al v. Greenwich Insurance Company
| Southern California Edison Company and Edison International |
| Greenwich Insurance Company |
| 2:2022cv05984 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| John F Walter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 9/22/2023 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 9/29/2023 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 10/10/2023 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: April 3, 2023. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: April 7, 2023. For ADR Procedure No. 3, counsel are responsible for contacting the private mediator at the appropriate time to arrange for further proceedings. (lom)
|
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company.. (Schulte, Yvonne) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Bridget S Johnsen counsel for Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. Adding Jennifer B. Hayden as counsel of record for Southern California Edison Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company. (Johnsen, Bridget) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Edison International, Southern California Edison Company, (Finch, Amber) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Lead Trial Counsel , Amber S. Finch filed by Plaintiffs Edison International, Southern California Edison Company. (Finch, Amber) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Lead Trial Counsel, Yvonne M. Schulte filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company. (Schulte, Yvonne) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REGARDING RULE 26 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #11 by Judge John F. Walter. DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Hearing re Rule 26 Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schulte, Yvonne) |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment B - Summons, #3 Attachment C - Complaint, #4 Attachment D - Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Attachment E - Notice of Case Management Conference, #6 Attachment F - Notice of Related Cases, #7 Attachment G - Greenwich Ins. Co.'s Answer to Complaint, #8 Attachment H - Notice to Court and Plaintiffs of Removal to United States District Court)(Lee, Christopher) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for September 26, 2022 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference.Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before September 12, 2022. (iv)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company.. (Lee, Christopher) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Southern California Edison Company, Edison International. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/2/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/23/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E)(ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company, identifying Corporate Parent(s). (Schulte, Yvonne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company. (Schulte, Yvonne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 22STCV24964 Receipt No: ACACDC-33862929 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Greenwich Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher J. Lee, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G) (Attorney Yvonne M Schulte added to party Greenwich Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Schulte, Yvonne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
