Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nicolas Arkells
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Nicolas Arkells |
| 2:2022cv05991 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Charles F Eick |
| Christina A Snyder |
| George H Wu |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Nicolas Arkells answer now due 11/16/2022, filed by Defendant Nicolas Arkells.(Attorney John C Cox added to party Nicolas Arkells(pty:dft))(Cox, John) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission, upon Defendant Nicolas Arkells served on 9/25/2022, answer due 10/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nicolas Arkells in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bentsen, Derek) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:21-cv-01586 CAS(PDx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge George H. Wu to Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-05991 CAS(PDx). Signed by Judge Christina A. Snyder (rn)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nicolas Arkells. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Bentsen, Derek) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Bentsen, Derek) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attorney Derek S. Bentsen added to party Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pla))(Bentsen, Derek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nicolas Arkells | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Derek S. Bentsen |
| Represented By: | Daniel Oren Blau |
| Represented By: | Timothy Nicholas England |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nicolas Arkells | |
| Represented By: | John C Cox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
