Lifen Lu et al v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Lifen Lu, Xiaoying Zhu and Hiuhin Zhu |
| Director UR M JADDOU, Terri A. Robinson, AJELANDRO MAYORKAS, USCIS, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2022cv06172 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu. Dismissal is without prejudice. (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph William Tursi counsel for Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri A. Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Adding Joseph W. Tursi as counsel of record for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur M. Jaddou, Terri A. Robinson, and Alejandro Mayorkas for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur M. Jaddou, Terri A. Robinson, and Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party Terri A. Robinson(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph William Tursi added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft))(Tursi, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childress (illegible). Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie L. Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to K Lusby. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Amended Proof of Service (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 9/9/2022, answer due 11/8/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/9/2022, answer due 11/8/2022; Terri A. Robinson served on 9/9/2022, answer due 11/8/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 9/9/2022, answer due 11/8/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childress (illegible). Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie L. Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to K. Lusi. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri A. Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #6 . The summons was issued with the wrong date. Docket item 6 should be disregarded. A corrected summons will be issued. (et) |
| Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/6/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri A. Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (et) Modified on 9/6/2022 (et). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu, (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu. (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu. (D'Andrea, Susu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33906647 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Lifen Lu, Hiuhin Zhu, Xiaoying Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I) (Attorney Susu D'Andrea added to party Lifen Lu(pty:pla), Attorney Susu D'Andrea added to party Hiuhin Zhu(pty:pla), Attorney Susu D'Andrea added to party Xiaoying Zhu(pty:pla))(D'Andrea, Susu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
