Eric Toscano v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC
| Eric Toscano |
| Renewal by Andersen, LLC and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv06272 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR FINAL AND BINDING ARBITRATION AND FOR STAY OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #13 , the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the parties shall submit this Lawsuit in its entirety to final and binding arbitration pursuant to the Employment Agreement that was executed by Plaintiff on 5/15/2019. The lawsuit is stayed and administratively closed pending completion of the parties' final and binding arbitration. The parties shall file a joint status report or a stipulation to dismiss this action within ten days after the final disposition of their arbitration proceedings. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (gk)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION for Order ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR FINAL AND BINDING ARBITRATION AND FOR STAY OF ACTION filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zare, Arya) |
| Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/7/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 10/21/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Eric Toscano, (Litwin, John) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on September 2, 2022. (Zare, Arya) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC, attached as Exhibit B.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Eric Toscano in Los Angeles Superior Court on 7/27/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC. (Zare, Arya) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC, identifying Plaintiff Eric Toscano; Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC; Andersen Corporation, the sole member of Defendant Renewal by Andersen LLC; Littler Mendelson, P.C. - Counsel for Defendant; and Barkhordarian Law Firm, PLC - Counsel for Plaintiff. (Zare, Arya) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Adrienne Llamas re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC. (Zare, Arya) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC. (Zare, Arya) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22TRCV00631 Receipt No: ACACDC-33919640 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Renewal by Andersen, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Arya Andrew Zare added to party Renewal by Andersen, LLC(pty:dft))(Zare, Arya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
