Yao Guan v. Susan Curda et al
| Yao Quan and Yao Guan |
| Susan Curda and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| USCIS |
| 2:2022cv06312 |
| September 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yao Guan, upon Defendant Susan Curda served on 9/19/2022, answer due 11/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Richard Childvess. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Richard Childvess. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 11 60-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #6 as to Defendant Susan Curda, District Director of US Citizenship and Immigration Services. (gk) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #6 filed by Plaintiff Yao Guan. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached." Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. It is unclear as to whether this Summons is filed as to document number 1 or 6. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (gk) |
Filing 8
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (kmh)
|
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #6 Yao Quan. (Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 09/05/2022, receipt number 33927785).(Luan, Steve) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The Summons Requests was filed under the incorrect event. The correct event is: Civil Events > Service Documents > Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints > Summons Request. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties were incorrectly filed as attachments. Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33927785 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Yao Quan. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document, #2 Unredacted Document, #3 Unredacted Document) (Attorney Steve Xiao Ming Luan added to party Yao Quan(pty:pla))(Luan, Steve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
