Jesus Garcia v. George Luis Trujillo
Jesus Garcia |
George Luis Trujillo and DOES 1 to 10 |
2:2022cv06321 |
September 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
R Gary Klausner |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant George Luis Trujillo. (jtil) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (jre) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Jesus Garcia. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jesus Garcia. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-33929240 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Jesus Garcia(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.