Sonya Valenzuela v. The Kroger Co. et al
Sonya Valenzuela |
The Kroger Co., and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, DOES 1 through 25, inclusive and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv06382 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 Notice of Supplemental Authority (Second) filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Second Notice of Supplemental Authority, #2 Exhibit 2 to Second Notice of Supplemental Authority, #3 Exhibit 3 to Second Notice of Supplemental Authority, #4 Exhibit 4 to Second Notice of Supplemental Authority)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 42 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #37 set for hearing on October 27, 2023, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 41 Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 40 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #37 Defendant's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 39 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #37 Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's first Amended Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 38 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #37 filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 1 to RJN, #3 Exhibit 2 to RJN, #4 Exhibit 3 to RJN, #5 Exhibit 4 to RJN, #6 Response to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Proposed Order)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 37 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. Motion set for hearing on 10/27/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J. Harper in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, #2 Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint) (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 36 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 35 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Kroger Co.'s motion to dismiss #14 is GRANTED, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall file her amended complaint, or notify the Court and Defendant Kroger that she does not intend to amend, by 7/14/2023. Defendant's response shall be filed within 21 days after the filing of the amended complaint. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Filing 34 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Eighth Notice of Supplemental Authority Relate to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 33 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Seventh Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 32 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Sixth Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 31 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Fifth Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 30 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Fourth Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 29 RESPONSE filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.to Notice of Decision by other Court #27 Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 28 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Third Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Decision: Javier v. Assurance IQ, LLC, No. 20-cv-02860-CRB, 2023 WL 114225 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2023) (Breyer, J.) filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 26 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Defendant's Notice of Supplemental Authority Related to Pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuelato Response #24 to Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Notice of Supplemental Authority Re: Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 24 RESPONSE filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.to Notice (Other) #22 Notice of Supplemental Authority (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 22 Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuelato Supplement(Motion related), #19 , Supplement(Motion related), #18 (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Supplement(Motion related), #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 19 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Exhibit A to Notice of Supplemental Authority [Dtk 18] filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 18 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 17 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #14 presently scheduled for hearing on December 16, 2022, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 15 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #14 filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. Motion set for hearing on 12/16/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 13 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #12 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, having considered the parties Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS that Defendant respond to the complaint no later than November 11, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm) |
Filing 12 Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 11-11-2022 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant The Kroger Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jacob Harper, #2 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation)(Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 11 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #10 , by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On October 6, 2022, Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela and Defendant the Kroger Co. filed a joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint. The parties stipulated to extend by 14 days the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs complaint, from October 14, 2022, to October 28, 2022. The Court, having considered the parties Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, hereby APPROVES the Stipulation and ORDERS that Defendant respond to the complaint no later than October 28, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm) |
Filing 10 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Kroger Co. answer now due 10/28/2022, filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jacob Harper in Support of Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Kroger Co. answer now due 10/14/2022, filed by Defendant The Kroger Co..(Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Sonya Valenzuela in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/3/2022, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Notice of Pendency of Other Action filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 3 Defendant's Notice of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Kroger Co., (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Harper, Jacob) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 22STCV25119 Receipt No: ACACDC-33940367 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant The Kroger Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Attorney Jacob Michael Harper added to party The Kroger Co.(pty:dft))(Harper, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.