David Plastik v. Music Connection, Inc.
David Plastik |
Music Connection, Inc. |
2:2022cv06409 |
September 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Patricia Donahue |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 10/28/2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Plastik, upon Defendant Music Connection, Inc. served on 9/20/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Eric Betteli, Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Music Connection, Inc. (lh) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Plastik, identifying SANDERS LAW GROUP, Craig B. Sanders, Music Connection, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by David Plastik. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff David Plastik. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Plastik. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33944351 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff David Plastik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photograph) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party David Plastik(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: David Plastik v. Music Connection, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Plastik | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Music Connection, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.