Capo, L.P. v. Citizens Insurance Company of America
Capo, L.P. |
Citizens Insurance Company of America and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2022cv06410 |
September 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Michael R Wilner |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Evidentiary Objections In Support of re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles County Superior Court #10 -- Evidentiary Objections to Portions of the Declaration of Tyler R. Austin Submitted In Support of Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Capo, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Boustani, Jonathan) |
Filing 17 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles County Superior Court #10 --Reply In Support of Motion to Remand by Plaintiff Capo, L.P. filed by Plaintiff Capo, L.P.. (Boustani, Jonathan) |
Filing 16 Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles County Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Tyler R Austin ISO Opposition to Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order Denying Motion to Remand)(Austin, Tyler) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Austin, Tyler) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT --Plaintiff Capo, L.P.'s Notice of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement [L.R. 7.1-1 and Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 7.1] filed by Plaintiff Capo, L.P. (Boustani, Jonathan) |
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling Conference set on October 28, 2022. A Scheduling and Case Management Order to issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America.. (Austin, Tyler) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles County Superior Court #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Capo, L.P.. Motion set for hearing on 11/18/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan J. Boustani, #2 Proposed Order) (Boustani, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/14/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 10/28/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 7 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America, identifying Citizens Insurance Company of America, The Hanover Insurance Company, Opus Investment Management, Inc., and The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.. (Austin, Tyler) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Citizens Insurance Company of America, Does., filed by Plaintiff Capo, L.P. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/3/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22SMCV01282 Receipt No: ACACDC-33944530 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Citizens Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Tyler R Austin added to party Citizens Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Austin, Tyler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.