Raul Guerrero et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Raul Guerrero and Uriel Villegas |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 10 inclusive |
| 2:2022cv06479 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiffs Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas.(David, Chad) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #28 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Colin Patrick Cronin on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Attorney Colin Patrick Cronin added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Cronin, Colin) |
| Filing 27 MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: No appearance made for Plaintiff. The Court and defense counsel confer about settlement status. Due to Plaintiff's failure to appear, the Court issues an order to show cause (OSC) re: dismissal at 12/16/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Plaintiff's counsel are ordered to file a response to the OSC by no later than 9:00 AM on 12/9/2022. Off the record and outside the presence of the parties, the Court notes that Mr. Cronin has not filed a notice of appearance in this case. He is directed to file a notice of appearance. Court Reporter: Suzanne McKennon. (gk) |
| Filing 26 STATUS REPORT ((JOINT)) filed by Plaintiffs Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas. (David, Chad) |
| Filing 25 (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties have filed a status report indicating that they have settled this case. Dkt. No. #24 . The Court converts the November 18, 2022 hearing on Defendant's motion to remand (Dkt. No. #18 ) to a status conference. The parties are directed to file either a notice of dismissal or a joint status report as to their settlement no later than November 14, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. If the parties file a notice of dismissal by this deadline, the status conference will be vacated without further Order.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 24 STATUS REPORT ((JOINT)) filed by Plaintiffs Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas. (David, Chad) |
Filing 23
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court modifies the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs Motion to Remand Case (Dkt. No. #18 ). Plaintiffs' opposition is due no later than October 19, 2022. Defendants reply is due no later than October 26, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 21
PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 20
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The DOE defendants remaining after 11/14/2022 are dismissed by operation of this Order and without further notice. The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report and sets the pretrial and trial dates noted in this order based on an evaluation of the complexity of the case. Jury Trial set for 3/27/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 3/17/2023 10:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties (Hearing Deadline) 11/14/2022. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 1/13/2023. Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 1/20/2023. Non-Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 1/20/2023. Settlement Conference Deadline 2/3/2023.Post-Settlement Status Conference set for 2/17/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Report due by 2/10/2023. Trial Filings (First Set) Deadline 2/24/2023. Trial Filings (Second Set) Deadline 3/3/2023. See document for further details. (gk)
|
| Filing 19 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court conferred with the parties about their Joint Rule 26(f) report. The parties are directed to promptly meet and confer to discuss the possibility of resolution of the case or a stipulated remand, and to file a Joint Status Report as to their discussions no later than 10/14/2022. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (gk) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse in Long Beach filed by Plaintiff Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas. Motion set for hearing on 11/18/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (David, Chad) |
|
Filing 17
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.Plaintiff's counsel's request to appear remotely at the Mandatory Scheduling Conference (MSC) set for October 7, 2022 is GRANTED. Instructions for remote appearance can be found on Judge Blumenfeld's webpage. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Chad Allen David counsel for Plaintiffs Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas. Jon P. Jacobs is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Raul Guerrero. (David, Chad) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties Dkt. No. #12 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The document is stricken. (jgr) |
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Reynolds, Christine) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document submitted in the wrong case. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 12 *STRICKEN SEE Dkt. No. #14 * NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas, (David, Chad) Modified on 9/28/2022 (jgr). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Guerrero, (David, Chad) |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Raul Guerrero.. (David, Chad) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on October 7, 2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by September 27, 2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 8
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case transferred from Judge John A. Kronstadt to the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:22-cv-06479 SB(PDx). (rn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 2. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ford Motor Company, filed by Plaintiffs Raul Guerrero, Uriel Villegas. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/8/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties)(Reynolds, Christine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22LBCV00391 Receipt No: ACACDC-33959761 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Elizabeth McNulty in support of Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration Declaration of Christine Reynolds in support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Christine Diaz Reynolds added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Reynolds, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
