Shane Kisman et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shane Kisman and Jason Killinger
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv06498
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Jason Killinger. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Cantor, Zachary)
October 7, 2022 Filing 17 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Complaint filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc..(Wilson, Susan)
October 7, 2022 Filing 16 Notice Notice of Errata filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Wilson, Susan)
October 7, 2022 Filing 15 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Susan M Wilson on behalf of Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (Wilson, Susan)
October 7, 2022 Filing 14 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Susan M Wilson on behalf of Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (Attorney Susan M Wilson added to party United Parcel Service, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wilson, Susan)
September 28, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
September 27, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Jason Killinger, served on 09/19/2022. (Cantor, Zachary)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassign Pursuant to General Order 21-01 filed on September 16, 2022. (see document for further details) (bm)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-06498 DMG(SKx). (rn)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Andre Birotte Jr, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:21-cv-03164 AB(Ex) (rn)
September 13, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment(s): # 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No #1 The document(s) should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs.. (sh)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
September 13, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
September 13, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh)
September 12, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying UPS, Inc.. (Cantor, Zachary)
September 12, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Jason Killinger, Shane Kisman. Related Case(s): 2:21-CV- 03164-AB-E (Cantor, Zachary)
September 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33963798 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Shane Kisman, Jason Killinger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Zachary Michael Cantor added to party Jason Killinger(pty:pla), Attorney Zachary Michael Cantor added to party Shane Kisman(pty:pla))(Cantor, Zachary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shane Kisman et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shane Kisman
Represented By: Zachary Michael Cantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Killinger
Represented By: Zachary Michael Cantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Represented By: Susan M Wilson
Represented By: Aaron H Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?