Marvin Janis Morris v. Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc. et al
| Marvin Janis Morris |
| Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc., Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv06505 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #31 . The following error(s) was/were found: Blank document. Document not flattened. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 31 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Tricia A. Pham counsel for Defendant Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. Tricia A. Pham is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. (Pham, Tricia) |
Filing 30
Order to Show Cause by Judge Dale S. Fischer re Adequacy of Counsel. Plaintiff's counsel and other counsel who are likely to play a significant role are ordered to show cause in writing no later than 12/15/2022. See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 10/23/23. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 28
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/18/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 1/16/2024 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 27 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. Class certification motion dates are approved. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 26 REPORT of Revised Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. (Bekam, Fawn) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer DENYING Motion to Remand; Order GRANTING Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #12 , #14 ). Leave to amend is granted consistent with this order. An amended complaint must be filed and served no later than 11/20/2022. See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
|
Filing 24
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The motion cut-off date chosen by the parties is a holiday. The parties proposed expert witness disclosure dates are unacceptable. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are to file a revised report no later than October 24, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 23 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 22 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #12 filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. (Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #12 filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 19 OPPOSITION IN OPPOSITION TO re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Declaration Declaration of J. McOsker ISO Opposition, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Declaration of JEM)(Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris, identifying Marvin Janis Morris. (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 16 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris (Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 15 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before A United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc. (Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. Motion set for hearing on 10/24/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Fawn F. Bekam, #2 Proposed Order) (Bekam, Fawn) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/17/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (pk)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/24/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A meet and confer, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to R4JN - CBA (10-1-17-09-30-20), #5 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to R4JN - CBA (10-1-20 - 09-30-23), #6 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to R4JN - Calif Min Wage Order, #7 Proposed Order) (Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Fawn F Bekam on behalf of Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris (Attorney Fawn F Bekam added to party Marvin Janis Morris (pty:pla))(Bekam, Fawn) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc., re Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only,, #9 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 09/14/2022. (Pham, Tricia) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc., re Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on September 12, 2022. (Pham, Tricia) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. Filed in State Court on 5/12/2022 Submitted with 1 Attachment to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc. amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Marvin Janis Morris. Submitted with Attachment 1 pg 80 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc. identifying Vopak Terminals North America, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by defendant Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc., (Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. (Pham, Tricia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 22STCV15823 Receipt No: ACACDC-33966747 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc., Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-4 Complaint, Amended Complaint) (Attorney Tricia A. Pham added to party Vopak Terminal Long Beach Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Tricia A. Pham added to party Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc.(pty:dft))(Pham, Tricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
