Marcina Huey et al v. Walmart Inc. et al
| MARCINA HUEY |
| WALMART INC, Walmart Inc., Luisa Last Name Unknown, Tanya Last Name Unknown and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| LUISA (LAST NAME UNKNOWN), TANYA (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) and DOES 1-100, inclusive, |
| 2:2022cv06506 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #9 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #10 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #8 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #11 served on 9/14/2022. (Kabani, Zeeshan) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/23/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/7/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Luisa Last Name Unknown, Tanya Last Name Unknown, Walmart Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Marcina Huey. Filed in State Court on 8/4/2022 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant WALMART INC, re Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 9/12/2022. (Jassy, Kara) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant WALMART INC, identifying Plaintiff Marcina Huey, Lawyers for Employee and Consumer Rights, APC, Counsel for Plaintiff; Littler Mendelson, P.C., Counsel for Defendant, Walmart Inc.. (Jassy, Kara) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant WALMART INC (Jassy, Kara) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant WALMART INC. (Jassy, Kara) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant WALMART INC. (Jassy, Kara) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior-Central District, case number 22STCV25097 Receipt No: BCACDC-33968441 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant WALMART INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ZEESHAN KABANI IN SUPPORT OF REMOVAL, #2 Exhibit A to Kabani Declaration Iso Removal-Summons, Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit B to Kabani Declaration Iso Removal - Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Kara L. Jassy added to party WALMART INC(pty:dft))(Jassy, Kara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
