Daniel Woods v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
| Daniel Woods |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation, Lockheed Martin, Richard Barrazam, Danielle Bartos, Lasheena Maclin and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv06512 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Receipt of LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL-REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (aco) |
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles. (rolm) |
Filing 12
COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson remanding case to Superior Court of CA, County of Los Angeles, Case number 22STCV24979 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (rolm)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 10 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for October 31, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. This action has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation, (Attorney Michael E Wilbur added to party Lockheed Martin Corporation(pty:dft))(Wilbur, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Notice Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Woods. (Shegerian, Carney) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Daniel Woods in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/3/2022, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation in Los Angeles Superior Court on 9/12/2022, attached as Exhibit D.(jtil) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Wilbur, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, case number 22STCV24979 Receipt No: ACACDC-33967775 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Wilbur 9.7.22 Email to Opposing Counsel, #2 Exhibit B - Wilbur 9.9.22 Email to Opposing Counsel, #3 Exhibit C - Summons and Complaint and initiating documents from state court, #4 Exhibit D - LMC Answer to Complaint) (Attorney Michael E Wilbur added to party Lockheed Martin Corporation(pty:dft))(Wilbur, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
