Push Data LLC v. Smashburger IP Holder LLC
Plaintiff: Push Data LLC
Defendant: Smashburger IP Holder LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv06580
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Push Data LLC answer now due 12/15/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Push Data LLC.(Wiener, Seth)
October 27, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Push Data LLC, upon Defendant Smashburger IP Holder LLC served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chimere Brooks, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Wiener, Seth)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (dgo)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:22-cv-06580 JWH(JPRx). (rn)
September 15, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Smashburger IP Holder LLC. (lh)
September 15, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
September 15, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh)
September 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Push Data LLC; Smashburger IP Holder LLC. (Wiener, Seth)
September 14, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Push Data LLC. (Wiener, Seth)
September 14, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Push Data LLC. (Wiener, Seth)
September 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Push Data LLC. (Wiener, Seth)
September 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33984040 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Push Data LLC. (Attorney Seth W. Wiener added to party Push Data LLC(pty:pla))(Wiener, Seth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Push Data LLC v. Smashburger IP Holder LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Push Data LLC
Represented By: Seth W. Wiener
Represented By: Seth W Wiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smashburger IP Holder LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?