Vardan Grigoryan v. Target Corporation
VARDAN GRIGORYAN |
TARGET CORPORATION and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv06617 |
September 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
John F Walter |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 9/8/2023 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for hearing on 9/15/2023 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2023 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv) |
Filing 18 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on October 24, 2022 is vacated and taken off calendar.A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: May 1, 2023.The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: May 5, 2023. (iv) |
Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial five to ten days, filed by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is incorrect. Case number is incorrect. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial five to ten days, filed by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Vardan Grigoryan, served on 09/20/2022. (Kiramijyan, Armen) |
Filing 13 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vardan Grigoryan (Kiramijyan, Armen) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Armen Kirmijyan filed by Plaintiff Vardan Grigoryan. (Kiramijyan, Armen) |
Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for October 24, 2022 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before October 7, 2022. (iv) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 20, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Target Corporation., filed by Plaintiff Vardan Grigoryan.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/15/2022 SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendant Target Corporation.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT C TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice (Other) #3 served on 09/15/2022. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 3 Notice Notice to Adverse Party of Filing Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court [28 U.S.C. Section 1441(b)(1) filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV6366 Receipt No: ACACDC-33992096 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Attorney Gabrielle A Pedone added to party TARGET CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Pedone, Gabrielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.