Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. Side, Inc et al
Jorge Alejandro Rojas |
Side, Inc doing business as Kase Real Estate, Guy Gal and Jonathan Amarasinghe |
2:2022cv06640 |
September 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Dale S Fischer |
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (lh) |
Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Jonathan Amarasinghe. (lh) |
Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Guy Gal. (lh) |
Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Side, Inc. (lh) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jorge Alejandro Rojas, (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Jonathan Amarasinghe, Guy Gal, Side, Inc. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Filing Fee $402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Jorge Alejandro Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.