Global Mushroom LLC v. VIP Marketing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Global Mushroom LLC
Defendant: VIP Marketing, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv06687
Filed: September 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Agriculture Acts
Cause of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT (DKT 13) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Judgment shall be granted in favor of Global Mushroom LLC and against VIP Marketing, Inc. Judgment shall be entered in the principal amount of $310,906.75, plus interest at the rateof 1% per annum from the date of this Order until paid, plus $500.00, as well as $685.00 in attorneys' fees and $444.25. VIP Marketing, Inc. waives any right of appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
November 29, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Global Mushroom LLC Response to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution as to VIP Marketing, Inc. (Ferrier, Robert)
November 28, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION for Judgment as to in favor of Global Mushroom and against VIP Marketing filed by plaintiff Global Mushroom LLC.(Ferrier, Robert)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO VIP MARKETING, INC. by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than November 29, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses as to VIP Marketing, Inc. (see document for further details) (bm)
September 28, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Global Mushroom LLC, upon Defendant VIP Marketing, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 9/28/2022, answer due 10/19/2022. Acknowledgment of Service signed by John Lapinski, Attorney for VIP Marketing, Inc.. (Ferrier, Robert)
September 23, 2022 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 as to Defendant VIP Marketing, Inc.. (yl)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
September 22, 2022 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 filed by Plaintiff Global Mushroom LLC. (Ferrier, Robert)
September 21, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Global Mushroom LLC, identifying None. (Ferrier, Robert)
September 21, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh)
September 21, 2022 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
September 21, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
September 21, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh)
September 21, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 09/19/2022,, filed by Plaintiff Global Mushroom LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Robert Mason Ferrier added to party Global Mushroom LLC(pty:pla))(Ferrier, Robert)
September 20, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Global Mushroom LLC v. VIP Marketing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Global Mushroom LLC
Represented By: Robert Mason Ferrier
Represented By: William S Kronenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIP Marketing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?