Vicky Bernice Williams et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
Vicky Bernice BERNICE, ARTHUR WILLIAMS, Vicky Bernice Williams and Arthur Williams, Jr. |
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. and Does 1-50, Inclusive |
2:2022cv06733 |
September 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
John E McDermott |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION #17 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. On October 5, 2022, Plaintiffs Vicky Bernice Williams and Arthur Williams, Jr. (Plaintiffs) filed a Notice of Dismissal, dismissing the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) or (c). Dkt. 17. Having considered the Notice of Dismissal and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS: 1. All dates and deadlines governing this action are VACATED. The courts September 21, 2022 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. 2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm) |
Filing 17 Notice NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c) filed by Plaintiffs Arthur Williams, Jr, Vicky Bernice Williams. (Shapero, Sarah) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Report #12 , for the following reasons: The document is for 5:22cv00985GWSHK Dandridge vs Select Portfol; (lc) |
Filing 15 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Report #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document submitted in the wrong case. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. The document is for 5:22-cv-00985-GW-SHK Dandridge vs Select Portfolio Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #3 ; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DENIES Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 3).Furthermore, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to Show Cause (OSC) in writing, on or before October 5, 2022, why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (lc) |
Filing 12 (STRICKEN PER 9/23/2022 ORDER DOCKET NO. 16) JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE REPORT filed by Plaintiffs Arthur Williams, Jr, Vicky Bernice Williams. (Shapero, Sarah) Modified on 9/26/2022 (lc). |
Filing 11 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Arthur Williams, Jr, Vicky Bernice Williams. (Shapero, Sarah) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 . Document # 5 and 6 Due to clerical error. The docket clerk docketed the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program and Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before and Magistrate Judges without the judges initials in error onto forms. (ghap) |
Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/21/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 7] Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) Modified on 9/21/2022 (ghap). |
Filing 5 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/21/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 7] NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) Modified on 9/21/2022 (ghap). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
Filing 3 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to RESTRAIN TRUSTEES SALE that is at 9:00 am on September 22nd, 2022 filed by Plaintiff Vicky Bernice BERNICE, ARTHUR WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO ENJOIN THE TRUSTEES SALE AGAINST PLAINTIFFS PROPERTY, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF DARIO PUCCINI IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION NOTICE FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, #3 Declaration DECLARATION OF VICKY BERNICE WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO ENJOIN THE TRUSTEES SALE AGAINST PLAINTIFFS PROPERTY, #4 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER) (Shapero, Sarah) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vicky Bernice BERNICE, ARTHUR WILLIAMS, (Shapero, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34012722 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Vicky Bernice BERNICE, ARTHUR WILLIAMS. (Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Shapero added to party Vicky Bernice BERNICE(pty:pla), Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Shapero added to party ARTHUR WILLIAMS(pty:pla))(Shapero, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.