Carl D. Stevenson v. Ct. Board of Parole et al
| Carl D. Stevenson |
| Ct. Board of Parole and Warden R. C. Johnson |
| 2:2022cv06823 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Order Re Petitioner's Letter and Exhibits (ECF #7) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: re: Supplement #7 . The Court has received a letter from Petitioner dated October 9, 2022. The letter requests that the Court "admit" two attached documents into the file: (1) a letter from the Clerk of the California Supreme Court informing Petitioner that his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed had been denied and that no action could be taken on his "motion for review" received on October 3, 2022; and (2) the California Supreme Court's September 21, 2022 order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to file the document in Case No. 2:22-cv-06823-MWF(AFM) as a "Supplement to Petition." If Petitioner fails to comply by October 27, 2022, this action may be dismissed without prejudice. [See Order for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 7
SUPPLEMENT to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 filed by Petitioner Carl D. Stevenson. (ib)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #5 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Request is DENIED because Petitioner has the ability to pay. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must pay the full filing fee of $5.00. (iv)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition (CV-111). Upon submission of your petition for writ of habeas corpus, it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action may be dismissed. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . (ghap)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Carl D. Stevenson. The Petitioner does not consent. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F MacKinnon.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Carl D. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 Petition Part 2) (ghap)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
