Fidel Escobedo et al v. United States of America et al
| Fidel Escobedo, Alexandra Escobedo, Mary Chavez and Michelle Ochoa |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Carlos Botello-Ortega, Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC, Charles James Ericsson, Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Splash Transport, Inc., Dwarika Boodoo and Republic Services |
| Roes |
| 2:2022cv06828 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Steve Kim |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/16/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/30/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Carlos Botello-Ortega, Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC, identifying Republic Services, Inc.. (Specter, Ronald) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Crossclaim, #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against Charles James Ericsson, Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Splash Transport, Inc. filed by Defendants Carlos Botello-Ortega, Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC.(Attorney Ronald C Specter added to party Carlos Botello-Ortega(pty:dft), Attorney Ronald C Specter added to party Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Specter, Ronald) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiffs Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Republic Services. (Conroy, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa, upon Defendant Carlos Botello-Ortega served on 10/15/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Botello-Ortega in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Conroy, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa, upon Defendant Republic Services served on 10/7/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anthony Deitch, Manager, Authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Conroy, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa, upon Defendant Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC served on 10/7/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anthony Seitch, Manager, Authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Conroy, Thomas) |
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Dwarika Boodoo, Carlos Botello-Ortega, Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC, Charles James Ericsson, Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Republic Services, Splash Transport, Inc., United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Carlos Botello-Ortega, #2 Charles James Ericsson, #3 Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC, #4 Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., #5 Republic Services, #6 Splash Transport, Inc.) (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Carlos Botello-Ortega, #2 Summons to Charles James Ericsson, #3 Summons to Consolidated Disposal Service, LLC, #4 Summons to Keurig Dr. Pepper, #5 Summons to Republic Services, #6 Summons to Splash Transport, Inc.)(Conroy, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Conroy, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa. (Conroy, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34029522 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Mary Chavez, Alexandra Escobedo, Fidel Escobedo, Michelle Ochoa. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Attorney Thomas J Conroy added to party Mary Chavez(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas J Conroy added to party Alexandra Escobedo(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas J Conroy added to party Fidel Escobedo(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas J Conroy added to party Michelle Ochoa(pty:pla))(Conroy, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
