Liberty Surplus Insurance Company v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation and Liberty Surplus Insurance Company
Defendant: U.S. Specialty Insurance Company and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv06897
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for December 1, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than November 23, 2022. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco)
October 25, 2022 Filing 12 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendants U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, identifying U.S. Specialty Insurance Company; Houston Casualty Company; Illium, Inc.; HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.; Tokio-Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.; Tokio-Marine Holdings, Inc.. (Mdinaradze, Maia)
October 25, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company.(Attorney Maia Mdinaradze added to party U.S. Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Mdinaradze, Maia)
October 11, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Liberty Surplus Insurance Company, upon Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Helen Herrick, Legal Department in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Tillage, Charles)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
September 26, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company. (sh)
September 26, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
September 26, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
September 26, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (sh)
September 23, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation. (Scott, Stephen)
September 23, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Liberty Surplus Insurance Company LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation, identifying Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group Inc., LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc. Liberty Mutual Holdings Company Inc.. (Scott, Stephen)
September 23, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation. (Scott, Stephen)
September 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34041425 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation. (Attorney Stephen A Scott added to party LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation(pty:pla))(Scott, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Surplus Insurance Company v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation
Represented By: Stephen A Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Surplus Insurance Company
Represented By: Charles E Tillage
Represented By: Stephen A Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Maia Mdinaradze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?